xRobot: Evolutionary Hypothesis Not Seen Videos

ThoughtProvokingShow Says:

Jul 17, 2008 - really evolution has nothing to say about dead chemicals evolving into living tissue? why not wear sunglasses? why would you be so interested in my face?

ThoughtProvokingShow Says:

Jul 17, 2008 - Yes, good point, much more logical than an unthinking process being able to determine over a vast period of time through trial and error how animals could adapt in specified environments in a positive way. You know what, if nature can do that without brains who needs to think? lol

AtheistCitizen Says:

Jul 17, 2008 - that's right Evolution has nothing to say about abiogenesis. Is your webcam too bright? It's just that you are creating a visual medium for us, and it is odd that you should then hide.

AtheistCitizen Says:

Jul 17, 2008 - Give a try someday!

ThoughtProvokingShow Says:

Jul 18, 2008 - No, garouDefining evolution is: "A gradual process in which something changes into a different and usually more complex or better form." The hypothesis applies to living and non living objects...

garouHH Says:

Jul 18, 2008 - No scientist worth a dime will try to defend such a claim, making it a strawman argument.

ThoughtProvokingShow Says:

Jul 19, 2008 - Maybe in the winter time...

ThoughtProvokingShow Says:

Jul 19, 2008 - Remember now, Darwin's hypothesis is not the total makeup of evolution. "A gradual process in which something changes into a different and usually more complex or better form." The hypothesis applies to living and non living objects..." Sums up the all fields of evolution!

AtheistCitizen Says:

Jul 19, 2008 - "evolution" can be applied to anything which takes into account current state, current environment and tracks over 'time'. Big 'E' Evolution is what Darwin wrote about; solely about species transitions Tho common in terminology, one cannot attack them all as tho one. Cosmology is not ruled by Evolution [no species],governments are not ruled by Evolution [no species],ideas are not ruled by Evolution [no species]...

AtheistCitizen Says:

Jul 19, 2008 - ... As creationist you want to attack biological Evolution, everything else is too broad &strictly unrelated.

AtheistCitizen Says:

Jul 19, 2008 - yeah, enjoy not thinking in the summer. Play sports, exercise outside. Live well. Then in the winter exercise the mind; starting to use the enfeebled organ.

RedArrow2007 Says:

Jul 20, 2008 - No substance in your replies, it's been all emotional and character attacks. Arguing over using the term "evolution" shows you have no basis for your beliefs.

RedArrow2007 Says:

Jul 20, 2008 - I most likely accomplished more things in my life than you have...I understand you being worried about creationists, if I was you, I would be worried too.

AtheistCitizen Says:

Jul 21, 2008 - LOL. I just pt out the oddity of the TPS attempt to misuse language, to extend the argument perversely. It is not about 'beliefs' for me, but rather a method of testing claims, and working with the best supported theories.

AtheistCitizen Says:

Jul 21, 2008 - nothing said about more complex, simply better suited to the environment in which it lives. Evolution is not progress, but adaptation.

AtheistCitizen Says:

Jul 21, 2008 - RA7 aren't we insecure, needing to feel good abt "accomplishments". Who said that I was "worried", just offended by the stupidity of YECs and theist generally.

DNAunion Says:

Jul 21, 2008 - Nope. Evolution deals with biological change, not with planet formation. Read Darwin's "On the Origin of Species" and you'll see that. Or read a modern college text, such as "Evolution" by Douglas J. Futuyma, and see that evolution is about biological change.

DNAunion Says:

Jul 21, 2008 - ***TPS: The big bang hypothesis is part of evolution ..***No, it's not. It's ignorant Creationists who claim that.Evolution - unqualified - deals with biological change. It doesn't deal with the big bang theory (it's a theory by the way, not a hypothesis) or planet/solar system formation. Oh, and evolution also does not deal with the origin of life: that's abiogenesis.

DNAunion Says:

Jul 21, 2008 - Which has nothing to do with evolution.Perhaps such retarded statements as yours are the reason that your video got a rating of 1: the LOWEST POSSIBLE RATING!

ThoughtProvokingShow Says:

Jul 26, 2008 - You have yet to ID the link which has a major dictionary or text book to support your emotional claims....

DNAunion Says:

Jul 26, 2008 - You have to show that you anything but a fucktard. Well, make that a pigheaded fucktard! :-)

ThoughtProvokingShow Says:

Jul 27, 2008 - Planets according to the evolutionary hypothesis "evolved" otherwise it would be intelligent design. Properties of those planets change over time. This is part of evolution. I bet you don't even know what the Nebula hypothesis is.

garouHH Says:

Jul 28, 2008 - Solar systems and the planets in them, according to astrophysics (biology makes no comment on this) accreted out of interstellar matter under mutual gravitational pull, which is the nebular hypothesis of cosmogony. It has nothing to do with populations of entities that self-replicate with modification while being subject to selective pressures, which the theory of evolution is about. As this has gone on in circles so long now, I just have to ask: Are you thick on purpose?

ThoughtProvokingShow Says:

Jul 30, 2008 - Your argument has nothing to do with my video of the content within the video, just how I label things, you forgot to mention astrobiology...

garouHH Says:

Jul 30, 2008 - You make claims that the theory of evolution makes claims that it doesn't, then go on to discredit that strawman theory of your own making to try to discredit the theory of evolution. That *does* have to do with this videos content.